More Working Mothers = Better Birthrates?

Last week two interesting articles about working mothers in Germany turned up in the London Times and the Globe & Mail.  The pieces pointed out that Germany — for all of the benefits it offers families — is a difficult place for working mothers, who are strongly discouraged from maintaining their careers while their children are young.  The Globe & Mail suggests that this may be contributing to Germany’s very low birthrate; if women must sacrifice so deeply for children, it’s more likely that they will opt to remain childless.

Those of us who advocate for paid family leave, universal healthcare, and high-quality daycare and public education have a tendency to point across the ocean and idealize European systems.  But interestingly, while European families have higher quality of life in many ways, expansive career opportunity for women hasn’t been one of them.  One would think that might strengthen the traditional family, but overall Europe’s birthrates have been very low — 1.5 children per family, not enough to “replace” the population.  In Germany, Austria and Italy, among 17 others, the birthrate is either negative or at zero.

Scandinavian countries, which are striving for both quality of life and gender equity in the workforce, have fared better, averaging 1.8 children per family.  (Russell Shorto explores the declining birthrate phenomenon and talks about Scandinavia versus other parts of Europe in this fascinating New York Times Magazine article.)  But even in Scandinavian countries, the birthrate falls well below the United States’ average of 2.1 children per family.

When you’re in the thick of maternity and motherhood, the idea of a year-long leave or benefits that allow your family to live comfortably on a single income seem very appealing.  But more and more I’m meeting mothers from Europe who have chosen to live in the US, partly because their opportunities are so much more robust in this country.

That doesn’t mean we don’t need to continue to argue for massive change — there is an enormous difference between offering a year-long leave and the paltry twelve weeks unpaid that women in the US are guaranteed.  And there is something to be said for the pursuit of happiness; according to the OECD, eight of the ten world’s happiest places are in Europe.  The US doesn’t make the top ten list.

Maybe I have too much faith, but I see a constellation of factors converging in the US that is likely to lead to a new model that could expand workforce opportunity and choice for women, while boosting our happiness.  With more women entering and re-entering the workforce at higher levels of skill and education, and a new policy focus on working families by the Obama administration, there is much to be optimistic about.  Perhaps one day soon our European counterparts will look to us as the model.

Related links:


Filed under Happiness, News, Politics

3 responses to “More Working Mothers = Better Birthrates?

  1. Erika W

    Many great points! What strikes me here is that, just like any organization, policies mean very little in the U.S. if a person feels they should not use them. Our society, in general, may appear more open to working mothers, but when will U.S. women stop judging mothers for their choice to work or stay at home? This pervasive, underlying culture aka “Mommy Wars” could serve to hinder women from taking full advantage of future policies.

  2. Interesting post. It seems to me that the real issue that is stalling women is cultural norms i.e. the idea that a mother’s place is at home. Consequently, it is because of this belief that women in Europe have made fewer gains than their US counterparts in the workplace. Certainly public policies matter, but as your piece suggests, even generous maternity leave doesn’t seem to override societal expectations. Our best hope in this country are more responsive public policies that will allow working mothers to be able to continue to pursue their ambitions….and be great moms.

  3. This is very interesting and encouraging – a broadening of the conversation. I would like to recommend the following New York Times Magazine article (perhaps you have already discussed it elsewhere):

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s