Can We Have an Honest Conversation About Feminsim and Motherhood?

I’m growing increasingly concerned about the so-called “Mommy Wars”, but maybe not for the reasons you think.  It’s not because the conversation makes some mothers feel small or belittled (though it does), or even because the very existence of this debate when no such conversation happens about men smacks of sexism.  It’s because the more ridiculous and vitriolic this media-fueled frenzy becomes, the less possible it is to have an honest and conversation about women’s choices and how they affect our standing in the corporate world.

This struck me sharply in reading Elizabth’s Wurtzel’s recent Atlantic Monthly post, 1% Wives Are Helping Kill Feminism and Make the War on Women Possible.  Though some may not like me saying it, Wurtzel raises several valid points.  One is that when women give up their economic independence they give up power, and this is a profoundly anti-feminist action.  Another is that highly educated women who opt out to raise children do contribute to corporate stigmatization of child-bearing-aged women, who are assumed to be bad bets.  Large numbers of senior-level women leaving the workforce hurts the collective, no matter how you slice it.

Nonetheless, we can’t talk about these hard truths without acknowledging that care-giving is indeed an incredibly challenging job and that there are some women who are most fulfilled in that role.  Furthermore, one could argue that part of the problem is the childcare in general is not appropriately compensated.  Whether children are being cared for by a parent or a sitter, the job is notoriously financially undervalued.

But perhaps the greatest flaw in Wurtzel’s logic is that most women who stay at home are not one-percenters at all.  Census statistics show that stay-at-home mothers tend to be poor, under-educated, and unable to secure employment.  They do not have nannies, they do not go to Jivamukti yoga, and they don’t get pedicures.  They are struggling and would work if they could.

Indeed, Wurtzel’s vision of stay-at-home motherhood is limited to her narrow slice of life.  Arguably her brand of working, which is about writing books like Prozac Nation and memoirs about addiction has done no more to help real women in the corporate world than the stay-at-home mothers she villifies in her Atlantic piece.

I’ve written about this before: it seems that issues around working motherhood are written by women who don’t actually work in representative environments.  Wurtzel would have found a lot more sympathy with me if she had been able to tell the truth as one who had seen, if not experienced, it up close.  But she can’t, because like most writers covering women and work, she’s not in the trenches.

So here it is from one who knows: women do get side-lined in the corporate world after they have kids.  There is copious data on thisFor every child, a woman’s earning declines 7%Equally qualified mothers earn just 60% of a father’s dollarMothers are less likely to get promoted or receive raises.  They are considered bad long-term bets.  And almost certainly part of this is because some of our forebearers and contemporaries are choosing to opt-out.  Discrimination fueled in part by the choices we make is a significant factor behind the persistent pay gap, and the current brand of workplace sexism that primarily affects mothers.

Can we talk about that without using the term “Mommy Wars”?

Related links:

1 Comment

Filed under Politics, Uncategorized, Work

One response to “Can We Have an Honest Conversation About Feminsim and Motherhood?

  1. “… when women give up their economic independence they give up power, and this is a profoundly anti-feminist action.”

    Any feminist ideal that implies that women must make a certain choice (i.e. to remain economically independent) in order to support said feminist ideal, is profoundly anti-feminist.

    I think what makes discussions like this become ones about mommy-wars is when a particular group is singled out and cast in a negative light (i.e. the implication that women who stay at home — those who are financially dependant on a partner — are doing feminism a disservice). No part of feminism should be about disapproving of the choices women make.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s